What a bunch of wienies. Me me me, this is CHRISTIAN DISCRIMINATION, this is against CHRISTIANS. Well I have a couple of questions:
1. How does NO RELIGIOUS PARAPHANELIA target ONLY christians? Last I heard LOTS of religions include little emblems that can be turned into jewelry. You don't have the monopoly on religious jewelry.
2. NO RELIGION IN SCHOOLS...noone said no CHRISTIAN religion, they said NO RELIGION. That doesn't mean just Christians, that means, no Wiccan religion in school, no Pagan religion in school, no Muslim religion in schools...
You're "War on Christianity" is nothing more than enforcing rules and not only against "christians", but against EVERYONE.
I love this list of the "persecution" suffered by christianity (btw, christians, go talk to a Jew with a number tattooed on their arm they didn't ask for, then you might have an inkling what persectution is). Here'st he list:
The federal government abridges the free exercise of religion in America by:
Regulating churches and other religious organizations through its tax laws.
Limiting religious liberty in the area of public and private education.
Forbidding non-denominational prayer in public schools and at educational ceremonies.
Excluding the Bible from school classrooms and from other school property.
Refusing to permit the religious displays on public property, such as Christmas and Chanukah.
The City council in Oceanside, CA banned public prayers that begin or end with the phrase "in the name of Christ."
Ok ok, let me say first of all, this is all BS. This is expected of EVERY religion, not just "christians". Selfish little bastards, all they want is THEIR religion up, not anyone elses. Notice their gripe is with the state backing a religion, that the state is not backing THEIRS. I don't see them fighting to have Muslim precepts posted beside the 10 Commandments (commandments the most vocal of the "christian" religion can't even seem to follow), they also aren't allowing Wiccan or Pagan precepts up. No no, JUST the 10 Commandments. Somehow though, the word persecution doesn't seem to apply, I mean, I don't see "nailing us up on crosses" on the list, nor "hot irons applied to the feet", nothing like "fired because I was christian" or "arrested because I was christian" nor do I see "run out of town for being christian" or "tried to run me out of town for being christian'. However I can sure find signs of christians persecuting others!
30 Muslim workers fired for praying on job at Dell
http://tennessean.com/local/archives/05/03/66733769.shtml?Element_ID=66733769
Of course, a prayer of 5 minutes is unflexible for an employer, but christians refusing to work on Sundays is not?
Muslim Pilot Fired Due to Religion and Appearance, EEOC Says In Post- 9/11 Backlash Discrimination Suit
http://www.eeoc.gov/press/7-17-03a.html
"Woman says firm fired her for being Wiccan"
http://wwrn.org/article.php?idd=22062&sec=39&con=4
We could go on and on. However, you do see cases of christians fired, yes, and it seems it's always about following rules. Math teacher fired for preaching in class...yes, perhaps because he's a MATH teacher at a PUBLIC school. Woman fired for wearing her cross, yes perhaps because the policy there was NO RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS. See the trick of the eye there? WOMAN FIRED FOR WEARING CROSS, but only later is it pointed out that umm..NO religious symbols were allowed. They weren't firing her for the cross, they fired her for BREAKING THE RULES. I have never heard of an instance of an employer being accused of finding out Bob is a christian and firing him over it. But you hear many cases of finding out that Jill was Pagan, Tom was Muslim....ad nauseum.
What irritates me is not that christians want their rights, it's that convenient hearing thing they got. NO GOVERNMENT BACKED religion they actually seem to hear NO GOVERNMENT BACKED RELIGION except for Christians. NO RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS seems to translate as NO RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS except for Christianity. Wrong, no means no, none means none. And danged if these idiots don't get the job and proceed to disobey and then bitch about it. "*sputters* Well surely they don't mean me!" Yes! You TOO!
To me it's an all or nothing deal here: Either all religion in school or none. You post the 10 Commandments there will have to be equal time AND space for all other religions. You want the Bible in Class, then you must have all other religious books. You want Bible class, you better all religious classes. Or you take it all out. Quite frankly, if you stop and think of how much education these kids will miss just so you can be sure they will hear the Bible and the rest of us be sure all religions get equal time and treatment, you're better off taking it all out. Not to mention somehow I think the christians might rethink their view when we get past Bible Class. In fact, I would make it mandatory that Bible Class appear later than other religions at a random spot so parents can't force our kids to attend Bible class and then yank their kids out so they won't hear "Satan's Wild Ride" (Satanism IS a religion y'know).
We should do that, let's give the christians what they want under the law of our nation. Equal time with the rest of the world religions, in fact, I ask that it's mandatory that all students must attend or cannot graduate....yeah, the christians might get what they want, but boy will they hate it...and they might know how the rest of us feel...
Saturday, November 25, 2006
Monday, November 20, 2006
Where do we start today? Idiots of the world unite!
Please unite, it's very difficult sometimes to know what part of who's being a moron today when you have to pick and choose between so many options.
Ah why not cover something local for a change?
Last night we are on our way back from the MIL's house (that's mother in law) and for the last 3 days there's been heavy enough smoke over the area to blanket us in a fog. So as we pass and I realize that yet again we're going to have to run the baby through this into the house, I think to myself "Thank goodness Beaumont implemented a smoking ban because it's sooo much worse than this!" I thought by their little smoking ban they were saying "we want clean air". Well where the fuck is it? I thought by banning smoking they were all yelling "We want clean poison free air!" Ok, then WTF? Ok ok, let me get this straight:
You want "clean air" and so ban smoking from places you don't HAVE to go to and that noone HAS to work at (there were many non smoking establishments, I know because I kept a list of where NOT to go and they all needed help because we are still recovering from those in the hurricane last year too scared to return to the area), and where's the damn clean air? You mean to tell me it's not acceptable for my ONE cigarette (or in the case of a restaurant, 10 people's ONE cigarette each) in favor of a plant that is burning who knows what and putting out enough air pollution to BLANKET THE AREA IN FOG? And of course there's not just one plant around here, no no no, there are MANY. And the plant puts out enough smoke that you have no choice but to breathe it in, NO CHOICE at all. It even gets into your house. Ok ok, so we can't smoke in places your too stupid to vote with your feet and not come to, but apparently we should all breathe deep in our homes of a type of pollution not even matched in car exhaust? Talk about NO CHOICE, talk about being FORCED to inhale unwanted toxins. I never ever forced anyone to breathe in cigarette smoke, at no time have I ever waited until people were home and then pumped thier house with smoke....but I'M the asshole? It goes to show you, this is not, nor has it ever been for the health of anyone. This is all about we don't want you here. But you do want me to fund your child's education?
Texas raised the tobacco tax simply for child's education. Don't try that guilt trip bullshit on me, emotional blackmail "but you can't object cuz it's fer da chilren". You know what that means, because you don't smoke you obviously don't support education. hmm..gonna go by a t-shirt...
I want to know Beaumont, where's the clean air promised to all the inhabitants of this area? No smoking in Beaumont, that's automatic clean air..where is it?
Ah why not cover something local for a change?
Last night we are on our way back from the MIL's house (that's mother in law) and for the last 3 days there's been heavy enough smoke over the area to blanket us in a fog. So as we pass and I realize that yet again we're going to have to run the baby through this into the house, I think to myself "Thank goodness Beaumont implemented a smoking ban because it's sooo much worse than this!" I thought by their little smoking ban they were saying "we want clean air". Well where the fuck is it? I thought by banning smoking they were all yelling "We want clean poison free air!" Ok, then WTF? Ok ok, let me get this straight:
You want "clean air" and so ban smoking from places you don't HAVE to go to and that noone HAS to work at (there were many non smoking establishments, I know because I kept a list of where NOT to go and they all needed help because we are still recovering from those in the hurricane last year too scared to return to the area), and where's the damn clean air? You mean to tell me it's not acceptable for my ONE cigarette (or in the case of a restaurant, 10 people's ONE cigarette each) in favor of a plant that is burning who knows what and putting out enough air pollution to BLANKET THE AREA IN FOG? And of course there's not just one plant around here, no no no, there are MANY. And the plant puts out enough smoke that you have no choice but to breathe it in, NO CHOICE at all. It even gets into your house. Ok ok, so we can't smoke in places your too stupid to vote with your feet and not come to, but apparently we should all breathe deep in our homes of a type of pollution not even matched in car exhaust? Talk about NO CHOICE, talk about being FORCED to inhale unwanted toxins. I never ever forced anyone to breathe in cigarette smoke, at no time have I ever waited until people were home and then pumped thier house with smoke....but I'M the asshole? It goes to show you, this is not, nor has it ever been for the health of anyone. This is all about we don't want you here. But you do want me to fund your child's education?
Texas raised the tobacco tax simply for child's education. Don't try that guilt trip bullshit on me, emotional blackmail "but you can't object cuz it's fer da chilren". You know what that means, because you don't smoke you obviously don't support education. hmm..gonna go by a t-shirt...
I want to know Beaumont, where's the clean air promised to all the inhabitants of this area? No smoking in Beaumont, that's automatic clean air..where is it?
Saturday, November 18, 2006
Where are all these 5 year olds getting the money?
Boy, what is this, a race to see if I kill myself or you over the stupidity of the majority of the human race?
Yeah yeah, I'm here, having a baby and a surgery keeps you plenty busy I tell you. So anyhow, I have a question...where the fuck are all these kids getting the money and for the record how the hell are they sneaking out and grabbing up some mcnuggets? I'm not going to quote it here, there's the link, now RTFA.
We have two conclusions to draw here, one or both of which must be correct:
1. The children have all the money. The 5 year olds are deciding how to spend the paycheck (no wonder the world's finances are all kinds of fucked up)
2. Parents are too (stupid/retarded/weak/lazy/stupid..oh, I said that) to say NO to their children.
Wait, wait, there's a 3rd...out of the 15 billion people in the world there's 10,000 who overfeed their children for whatever reason (as a indication of love, cuz they don't care, whatever).
Guess what, if your kid looks like Violet from Willy Wonka after she eats the berry, in 98% of the cases one of these is you. There is one thing you can draw from all 3 of these conclusions: You're a fuckin' moron. Yes, Jalestra is back in full, non PC swing. Get the rope and burning torches.
1. If you let your children control your finances I can't help you. You're way too stupid to breathe, do me a favor and kill yourself.
2. If for whatever reason you have a problem telling little Jimmy no, you have two options: Learn to say NO, practice it, and then let little Jimmy have it (the NO you twit, not an uppercut) OR...kill yourself. You're doing your child no favors if your kissing his ass. In fact, you're just making another little punk for me to play trippee with in the grocery isle. While I enjoy the game, I would hope it would not be necessary since you'd be TEACHING your children instead of giving them everything they want and making my life even more miserable the few times I'm stupid enough to venture outside of my home.
3. Ok, some of you I feel sorry for, some of you should die. If you don't care about your kid, give him to me, I'd happily give him the kind of love and care any child deserves. Especially if it means keeping yet another little bastard from springing forth. I like kids...just not yours, especially after they grow up and try to rob me. For those replacing love with food, or feel that food is how you show your love, it's easy: Get a therapist, hug your kids, and try to learn how to relate to them. Pretend your a silly drunk and fingerpaint with them. The silly drunk act is great when interacting with children. If you've never been silly drunk, I'm sure you've seen it. (not to be mistaken for the crybaby drunk or the violent drunk).
In the meantime, remember, YOU are why you're kid is a fatass. Now this is not to disparage the overweight, I've been there, however, I knew who's fault is was (that would be MINE). And if you want to eat til they get a crane to take you to the hospital, that's your business not mine. Being overweight is NOT a dealbreaker for me. I've dated overweight men, I have overweight friends, I was once overweight myself. However, sometimes you have to be flat out rude to get people to look up from their 6th (by choice) Whopper and cut to the chase. If your kid is a fat ass, YOUR fault, leave MY food alone. Just because your too stupid to eat with some intelligence (no, not bean sprouts you twit, I eat Whoppers too, just not SIX of them), not my problem.
"We're all here to help one another." No, we aren't. We really aren't. Nobody knows what the fuck we're here for. Quite frankly, we are probably just here because we developed faster and stronger than the other animals. My body says if it's starving and your starving, I'm not splitting the fucking fish, it's MINE and if I'm big enough to kick your ass I get to keep it. Yes, sharing is the NICE thing to do, but as we'll eventually find out, when the food supply is low it's every man for himself. And whoever accused me of being nice? I'm not here to monitor your feeding habits or have you interfere with my life because you can't be a parent. I'm not here to help you parent. It does NOT take a village to raise a child. I've seen one person do it lots of times and everyone turned out fine. Everytime you get the village involved, poor kid is shot to hell because noone can agree if you should bust his ass or give him a cookie.
So, take the whopper and/or the money away from the child and leave me alone.
Yeah yeah, I'm here, having a baby and a surgery keeps you plenty busy I tell you. So anyhow, I have a question...where the fuck are all these kids getting the money and for the record how the hell are they sneaking out and grabbing up some mcnuggets? I'm not going to quote it here, there's the link, now RTFA.
We have two conclusions to draw here, one or both of which must be correct:
1. The children have all the money. The 5 year olds are deciding how to spend the paycheck (no wonder the world's finances are all kinds of fucked up)
2. Parents are too (stupid/retarded/weak/lazy/stupid..oh, I said that) to say NO to their children.
Wait, wait, there's a 3rd...out of the 15 billion people in the world there's 10,000 who overfeed their children for whatever reason (as a indication of love, cuz they don't care, whatever).
Guess what, if your kid looks like Violet from Willy Wonka after she eats the berry, in 98% of the cases one of these is you. There is one thing you can draw from all 3 of these conclusions: You're a fuckin' moron. Yes, Jalestra is back in full, non PC swing. Get the rope and burning torches.
1. If you let your children control your finances I can't help you. You're way too stupid to breathe, do me a favor and kill yourself.
2. If for whatever reason you have a problem telling little Jimmy no, you have two options: Learn to say NO, practice it, and then let little Jimmy have it (the NO you twit, not an uppercut) OR...kill yourself. You're doing your child no favors if your kissing his ass. In fact, you're just making another little punk for me to play trippee with in the grocery isle. While I enjoy the game, I would hope it would not be necessary since you'd be TEACHING your children instead of giving them everything they want and making my life even more miserable the few times I'm stupid enough to venture outside of my home.
3. Ok, some of you I feel sorry for, some of you should die. If you don't care about your kid, give him to me, I'd happily give him the kind of love and care any child deserves. Especially if it means keeping yet another little bastard from springing forth. I like kids...just not yours, especially after they grow up and try to rob me. For those replacing love with food, or feel that food is how you show your love, it's easy: Get a therapist, hug your kids, and try to learn how to relate to them. Pretend your a silly drunk and fingerpaint with them. The silly drunk act is great when interacting with children. If you've never been silly drunk, I'm sure you've seen it. (not to be mistaken for the crybaby drunk or the violent drunk).
In the meantime, remember, YOU are why you're kid is a fatass. Now this is not to disparage the overweight, I've been there, however, I knew who's fault is was (that would be MINE). And if you want to eat til they get a crane to take you to the hospital, that's your business not mine. Being overweight is NOT a dealbreaker for me. I've dated overweight men, I have overweight friends, I was once overweight myself. However, sometimes you have to be flat out rude to get people to look up from their 6th (by choice) Whopper and cut to the chase. If your kid is a fat ass, YOUR fault, leave MY food alone. Just because your too stupid to eat with some intelligence (no, not bean sprouts you twit, I eat Whoppers too, just not SIX of them), not my problem.
"We're all here to help one another." No, we aren't. We really aren't. Nobody knows what the fuck we're here for. Quite frankly, we are probably just here because we developed faster and stronger than the other animals. My body says if it's starving and your starving, I'm not splitting the fucking fish, it's MINE and if I'm big enough to kick your ass I get to keep it. Yes, sharing is the NICE thing to do, but as we'll eventually find out, when the food supply is low it's every man for himself. And whoever accused me of being nice? I'm not here to monitor your feeding habits or have you interfere with my life because you can't be a parent. I'm not here to help you parent. It does NOT take a village to raise a child. I've seen one person do it lots of times and everyone turned out fine. Everytime you get the village involved, poor kid is shot to hell because noone can agree if you should bust his ass or give him a cookie.
So, take the whopper and/or the money away from the child and leave me alone.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
